Separate listings for Fidelity International and FMR sounds right to me - when I worked there, admittedly years ago, they were separate legal entities, with separate voting systems and I think the voting was behind Chinese walls so they would not talk to one another. They had the same owners but were very separate companies reflecting the international and US backgrounds of each.
But the low figures overall are interesting. Keep up the good work!
I did wonder if it was an error, as the shareholding is the same, but would having the same position make sense under the separation of the businesses?
Separate listings for Fidelity International and FMR sounds right to me - when I worked there, admittedly years ago, they were separate legal entities, with separate voting systems and I think the voting was behind Chinese walls so they would not talk to one another. They had the same owners but were very separate companies reflecting the international and US backgrounds of each.
But the low figures overall are interesting. Keep up the good work!
I did wonder if it was an error, as the shareholding is the same, but would having the same position make sense under the separation of the businesses?